December 06, 2012 2:00 pm
1,086 Views
40 Comment
Prev
Broncos Fly "Pass" Raiders
Next
1 of 5
The Denver Broncos are not only one of the hottest teams in the AFC, but in the entire NFL.
The Broncos have the longest active winning streak in the league with seven consecutive wins.
It's safe to say that they are arguably the hottest team in the league right now.
The Oakland Raiders have a streak of their own going; unfortunately, it's a five game losing streak.
At this point they're playing for pride's sake in Oakland. But there is much more at stake for the division rival, Broncos.
Although "The Black Hole" is always a tough place to play; that alone won't be enough for the Raiders to overcome the surging Broncos.
Not to mention that they're Week 4 meeting ended with a 37-6 score in favor of the Broncos.
Both streaks will continue on, as Denver defeats Oakland.
Broncos win!
Week 13 left me a little dismayed. I put my knowledge on the San Francisco 49ers and they let me down. However, this is a new day, filled with new games and teams. Week 14 will be a better week. We several good games this week and like each of the prior weeks, there are teams who will be faced with defeat.
If you aren't sure who those teams are, you're definitely in the right place.
The "Football Guru" is back for another week, to give you Five Guaranteed Losers. But enough of that, let's get to our five games, featuring our five losers for Week 14.
Please Login to post a comment.
That's funny. We barely agree, but I too think that the Chargers have a shot.
What is it about the Chargers that give you guys hope? Because I'm definitely not seeing it, especially with Big Ben returning.
Seems like Derek and Marc were right!
You definitely called it!
That's probably a good thing!
Hence the GUARANTEED LOSERS... and even those obvious picks aren't so obvious. Look at the 49ers and the Rams last week.
Right I can read, but thanks for reiterating Marc. It's just what everyone is thinking anyways..well written, just stating my case.
How would you have written it? Would've been more risky? I see your article on the upsets. Is that more your style? Instead of the obvious, the unrealistic?
I see what you've written..oh wait. No, no I don't. I am not downplaying the writing, just leaving a comment. And don't contradict yourself bud.."look at the 49ers and Rams last week." And now you are saying upsets don't happen.
Yep. That would be the angle to take. Get on me for not being a contributor. Never said that you were downplaying the writing. You too are a contributor so I genuinely asked how you would've done it! And never once did I contradict myself. Upsets do happen, however his five losers are more likely to go over than your five upsets. That was my point.
Fair enough. I do personally like to take a different route when writing..given there is logic and chance behind it. Now for example if the Patriots were playing the Chiefs, I wouldn't think twice about choosing the Pats to win. My upsets I chose I do think can happen.
There is chance behind it all. It's the NFL. They're all professionals. Yet, some are superior in talent to others. Your upsets could happen. Any upset can happen. But in all likelihood, your picks are more of a longshot which was my point.
Okay.
Do you not agree? I mean, if they weren't longshots than they wouldn't be considered upsets. Lol. Do you think you'll clear on all five games?
Right, they are long shots. It's called going against the grain. Yes I do think so, hence why I wrote it. Eagles vs. Bucs is my biggest stretch as far as I'm concerned.
Right. Okay.
Nthn wrong with going against the grain.
If I'm not mistaken, I believe that I called it! You agreed.
toe-may-toe .... toe-mah-toe
Right! I agree!
He's losing his touch! Lol.